On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:15:18AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > The ballot didn't even provide enough data to find out the difference
> > between what was current and what would be the new text. It said "We
> > propose this as the new text. Go find out for yourself what it used to
> > be, and what our purpose is. Oh, and it's editorial, no need to worry".
>
> Did you follow the link to the rationale?
The point is that the rationale, or at least a summary of it, should be
_on the ballot_.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature