Re: "Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge" or "Debian commits suicide"
- To: Debian development list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: "Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge" or "Debian commits suicide"
- From: Hamish Moffatt <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 22:57:37 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040501125737.GB14479@cloud.net.au>
- Mail-followup-to: Debian development list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <20040429171225.A32758@synopsys.com> <20040430132548.GD7027@cloud.net.au> <20040430162334.GA1728@torrent> <20040430162947.GG31780@grep.be> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:50:38PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le ven 30/04/2004 à 18:29, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > > If there really is a silent 80% majority opposed to the recent GR,
> > > hopefully they'll bother to vote next time. We have a great voting
> > > system, but it only works if people take a few minutes to read the
> > > ballot, evaluate it, and send in a vote.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Exactly. The ballot has to provide enough data to make that possible
> > (which it didn't).
> It would have been rather hard to have the ballot evaluate the
> consequences of the change on the RM's interpretation of the social
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>