Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
Robert Lemmen wrote:
>right, and while we're at it: a standards document (like a RFC) is
>another different thing. it is and should be not allowed to modify it,
>and we should still be able to ship it. it is exactly as free as it
>should be.
Why the fuck should we not be allowed to modify it? If the license
allowed us to produce modified versions as long as we didn't claim that
it was an unmodified RFC whatever then there wouldn't be a problem, but
it doesn't even allow us to do that.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.devel@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: