Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
> AFAICS, GPL inclusion would render any package non-free.
And some authors require that the GPL be included in the package.
> Of course, this does lead to stupid consequences (AKA suicide). It's
> just an example that the editorial changes where stupid, because they do
> lead to such consequences.
> The opinion that GPL as a license doesn't make a component unfree seems
> to be settled on the old version of the SC that demanded only software to
> be free.
> Correct me if I'm wrong.
You are not wrong.
firstname.lastname@example.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill