Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003
Thomas Hood writes:
> Such a driver doesn't require non-free peripheral software in order to be
> compiled or in order to execute. Neither can it be called a "wrapper" of
> the software that gets loaded onto the peripheral.
> Provided that it does substantially more than just load the peripheral
Herbert Xu writes:
> Is that before or after loading the firmware?
I mean that it should be a real driver and not, for example, a mere wrapper
for some proprietary code to be loaded into a printer.
firstname.lastname@example.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill