Re: "service" command like that in Red Hat
Julian Mehnle <lists@mehnle.net> wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> * Andrew Pollock
>> > Are we after RedHat compatibility or a command with the same name with
>> > Debian's policy layer bolted on?
>> Since it's a RH compatibility command, the former.
> Is it, really? Or is it a convenience command, which happens to be
> similar to the Red Hat one, but has more capabilities because it's Debian?
Yes.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg01612.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200404/msg01615.html
> I don't think there's a need to be 100% Red Hat compliant here.
| a command doing something else than you expected is worse than
| "command not found"
Walking in circles, are we?
cu andreas
--
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel
Reply to: