Re: is it OK for invoke-rc.d stop not to stop?
- To: 242915-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: is it OK for invoke-rc.d stop not to stop?
- From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:46:25 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87smevikri.fsf_-_@jidanni.org>
- References: <20040411153036.GA30676@carlos> <E1BBpdT-0001ZS-Rj@jidanni.org> <handler.242915.C.108169747113081.notifdonectrl.0@bugs.debian.org> <87fzb3by8t.fsf@jidanni.org> <E1BBpdT-0001ZS-Rj@jidanni.org> <20040417055354.GA25712@carlos> <87oeppf0im.fsf@jidanni.org> <20040418232036.GA32502@carlos> <87ad14iwhs.fsf@jidanni.org> <20040422194032.GA20953@carlos.godisch.de>
>>>>> "M" == Martin Godisch <martin@godisch.de> writes:
M> You should really stop pestering me because you do not understand that
M> there is (and never was) any noffle daemon running because noffle is
M> invoked by inetd, and you do not know the difference between a daemon
M> and its children.
You're right. I don't understand very well. It just looked funny.
I guess the inetd class of processes are different. OK, never mind then.
Reply to: