[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gdm bug #133578. Intend to NMU.

Em Sex, 2004-04-16 às 20:36, Colin Watson escreveu:
> Your patch is incorrect. /etc/environment is *not* guaranteed to be
> sourceable by a Bourne-style shell.
> > But there's a patch submitted almost two years ago 2002/05/16.
> That patch also assumes shell syntax. Read the documentation, people!

Yes, I know. But it's guaranteed to have key=value pairs,  which can be
understood as if it were.

> There has been recent discussion among glibc people about how to fix it
> *properly*, and it involves changes to either PAM or glibc.

Could we have a provisory solution to this annoying bug wich is standing
for 2 years?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente

Reply to: