Em Sex, 2004-04-16 às 20:36, Colin Watson escreveu: > Your patch is incorrect. /etc/environment is *not* guaranteed to be > sourceable by a Bourne-style shell. > > But there's a patch submitted almost two years ago 2002/05/16. > That patch also assumes shell syntax. Read the documentation, people! Yes, I know. But it's guaranteed to have key=value pairs, which can be understood as if it were. > There has been recent discussion among glibc people about how to fix it > *properly*, and it involves changes to either PAM or glibc. Could we have a provisory solution to this annoying bug wich is standing for 2 years? daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente