On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 03:14:13PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:31:35PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Neither debconf nor apt-listchanges is a large application. However, > > debconf's dependencies are already priority: important or higher, while two > > of those of apt-listchanges (python-apt and ucf) would need to be elevated > > to standard. I could probably eliminate the ucf dependency with some > > beefier maintainer scripts, but python-apt would need to be elevated to > > standard. > > Given the changes implemented in version 2.50 (2.51 is in testing), I > would now consider apt-listchanges to be appropriate for Priority: standard, > if: Shouldn't concerns that NEWS files are untranslatable be addressed? Also, is it a bad idea to use debconf notes to achieve the same thing as the NEWS file? If so, why? -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature