On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 10:25:44PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:09:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > AFAICS you recall incorrectly. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2001/debian-devel-announce-200102/msg00002.html > > ...indicates there were 8 i386 packages in potato [...] > Sorry, I stand corrected. > I forgot that the usual pcmcia-modules mess was already present in > potato... I don't believe this was due to the pcmcia-modules stuff, which usually gets cleaned up by hand before a release goes out. > > How many users are running > > testing or unstable systems in mission critical roles? > Hopefully none... Hopefully or not, many users are in fact doing this. If you're not cognizant of these facts, you're really not in a good position to be making recommendations. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Protect Open Source in Australia from over-reaching changes to IP law http://www.petitiononline.com/auftaip/ & http://www.linux.org.au/fta/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature