[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: oldlibs & who determines Sections (was Re: raising severity of reports filed for packages build-depending on gcc-3.2

> > Actually, I have a *lot* of candidates for 'oldlibs'... how does one
> > go about suggesting such moves?  Who's authoritative; is it the
> > ftpmasters or the package?
> Sections are in the override file, therefore ftpmaster is authoritative.

However, the removal of -dev packages (and potential replacement with
-altdev) must be coordinated with the source package(r).

Reply to: