Re: oldlibs & who determines Sections (was Re: raising severity of reports filed for packages build-depending on gcc-3.2
> > Actually, I have a *lot* of candidates for 'oldlibs'... how does one
> > go about suggesting such moves? Who's authoritative; is it the
> > ftpmasters or the package?
> Sections are in the override file, therefore ftpmaster is authoritative.
However, the removal of -dev packages (and potential replacement with
-altdev) must be coordinated with the source package(r).