[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ifupdown needs an actual maintainer

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:25:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Javier =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <jfs@computer.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:35:59AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Or should someone else upload an ifdownup so your package doesn't get
> > > taken from you?
> > That's already been worked on, thanks (see the attached file). I find it
> > funny that some people will start flaming as soon as something shows up
> > instead of trying to focus that energy towards fixing bugs and providing
> > patches.
> So it realy will come down to having two ifupdown packages, one buggy
> and outdated by Anthony Towns and one under new name to fix the bugs?
> Thats sad, sad indeed.

No, it doesn't; Javier presumably misread your message, since he's been
working on an ifupdown (not "ifdownup") NMU for a while now.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

             Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
           http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: