On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:50:43PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:31:49AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:58:56PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > Hopefully the multiarch support in Debian can get off the ground soon
> > > before we lose too many more users.
> > We don't need multiarch in order to support amd64; in fact I would
> > personally prefer a straight amd64 port.
> I have heard in the past that for amd64 port to be allowed into the
> archive requires multiarch to be ready.
As far as I know, that was Goswin's thought; if the AMD64 port maintainers
want to make it a requirement, they're welcome to; but as far as anyone
else cares, they don't need it any more than ia64 did. TTBOMK, anyway.
(The stuff that is a requirement is getting close to being finished,
aiui; so you should be able to get into unstable around the same time
sarge is released I'd imagine)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature