[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: testing security (was Re: testing and no release schedule

Matthias Urlichs wrote:

> Hi, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>>  I always thought
>> that "best practice" was for maintainers to make new uploads to unstable
>> when there's a security update, which they do -- but *also* to make
>> security uploads to testing-proposed-updates.  This doesn't seem to
>> actually be done very often, unfortunately, even by otherwise very
>> diligent
>> maintainers.  :-P  I'm not sure why -- maybe testing-proposed-updates
>> simply isn't well-known or well-understood?  Or maybe it isn't processed
>> efficiently?
> If there are no dependency issues, Priority: high (or even "emergency",
> which doesn't seem to be that well-known either) works just as well.
Yeah; there often are dependency issues, of course.

Make sure your vote will count.

Reply to: