On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:07:10PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> ----- > [Original was intended by me to go to the list. Nothing private here for > me alone so forwarding to list.] > > Envelope-to: amacater@galactic.demon.co.uk > To: "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@galactic.demon.co.uk> > Subject: Re: testing and no release schedule > From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> > X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.86 (Venetian Way) > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 07:00:23AM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 09:58:19PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:53:34PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > > It's exactly the desktop software that often has > > > > very long dependency chains that are difficult to get into a releasable > > > > state at the same time. > > > > > > ...yet all of the other Linux distributors seem to be able to do it. > > > > > > --Adam > > Nope. Red Hat 9 - i386 only > > > > Fedora - i386/ia64 > > > > SuSE 9.1 i386/ia64/AMD ?? > > > > See any Alpha / SPARC / m68k ?? alpha is a dead arch m68k is a dead arch sparc is trying hard to stay alive with Sun using amd/intel hardware now The following archs are what they have supported in the past or seem to plan to support at some time in the future: Fedora - i386/ia64/ppc/ppc64/s390/s390x/x86_64 RedHat (RHEL) - i386/ia64/ppc/s390/s390x/x86_64 SUSE - alpha/i386/ia64/ppc/ppc64/s390/sparc/sparc64/x86_64 BTW - Fedora only releases archs when they are ready from the look of it with x86_64 core 1 release happening well after the i386 release. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature