Re: [OT] 'real'-names vs. nicks (was Re: Proposal: /etc/friendlynames)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-03-26 16:23, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:40:42PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
> > What makes a name real (in my eyes) is the fact that it clearly
> > designates 1 specific person, whether the particular name is
> > recognized and archived by your respective government is completely
> > irrelevant for most all practical purposes (legal matters being the
> > only exception I can think of).
>
> Tom Ballard changes his From: line every time people get used to it, so
> I don't think this really applies to him.
ah, ok that's definately annoying
- --
Cheers, cobaco
1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB)
2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double
format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAZFRB5ihPJ4ZiSrsRAgxgAKCEEMk+k8RZpRp3dRk6lx8dToqQVwCfbbBD
VS30tZ8wgQuqGwYUajXLAC0=
=w32M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: