Re: Proposal: /etc/friendlynames
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch> wrote:
> On Friday 26 March 2004 00.41, Number Six wrote:
>> Proposal, additions to Policy and changes to dpkg:
>>
>> (1) Add to policy: all package names must be nongeneric [1].
>
> And watch the endless discussions on what, exactly, is a generic name and what
> is not. Discussing this has, imho, worked well so far.
So a presupposed hyperrelativism will block here this interesting
proposal?
gnome-pdfviewer, gpdfviewer, are non-generic. pdfviewer is.
Is that so problematic? Who wants to argue about that?
--
Mathieu Roy
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
| Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ |
| Not a native english speaker: |
| http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: