Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
ti, 2004-03-23 kello 15:39, Mathieu Roy kirjoitti:
> Well, gs is ghostscript. But the proposal is to use gs as prefix, not
> as name.
The prefix "gs-" is already being used for Ghostscript related packages:
gs-common, gs-esp, and gs-fonts. Thus "gnustep-" seems like a better
choice for Gnustep related packages. It is also not an acronym of
Gnustep, which means that it is more easily recognizable without having
to know the context.
--
http://liw.iki.fi/liw/log/
Reply to: