On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:37:24AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > <snip> > > >> Is there any architecture that _really_ requires kernel 2.2 today? > > > > > > m68k, at least. > > > > Is this really true? There still appears to be code for m68k support in 2.4 > > *and* 2.6 kernels. > > Sure, development is going on. > > > And Debian actually contains kernel images for 2.4.20 > > on m68k. Has nobody managed to make it work? > > It depends on the subarchitecture. In the installer, m68k-amiga uses > 2.4.20, m68k-mac uses 2.2.25. m68k now has 2.4.25 and 2.2.25 and uses these in d-i. All the older kernels can probably be removed, but I intended to wait until the maintainer returns from vacation to ask. m68k needs to keep 2.2 kernels for now. Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature