Re: Bug#238193: use debconf to manage permissions of ls-r not high-priority question
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:28:56AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> > This should, by all rights, be a "serious" bug, but I don't know whether
> > it's realistic to consider this RC for sarge now that it's been ignored
> > for so long.
> The problem is that in fact we don't know whether sarge will be released
> within weeks or months. Currently we are dividing our efforts between
> the current packages with rather outdated tetex-2.0.2 and tetex-3.0
> which will be released within the next weeks (in this case really 2-6
> weeks, I'm sure).
I think it's a bad idea to try to get new major versions of major
systems like tetex into sarge at the moment, and I think trying to do so
is likely to delay sarge.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]