Re: udev device naming policy concerns
On Saturday 06 Mar 2004 14:44, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 06-Mar-04, 05:45 (CST), Tom Badran <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I really like a lot about the devfs naming scheme, especially the
> > printers/X and vc/X, however if the kernel guys say the old fashioned way
> > is _proper_ then that is best to have as default.
> The "kernel guys" aren't saying that *anything* is "proper", which is
> one of the points of udev. "Here's a device, call it what you want" is
> their point-of-view.
Sorry, must have misinterpreted it then, i got the impression from earlier
posts this was the case.