Re: ITH: gdm -- GNOME Display Manager
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ITH: gdm -- GNOME Display Manager
- From: Mark Howard <mh@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:37:46 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040301093746.GA2807@pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk>
- In-reply-to: <87y8ql64oc.fsf@unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us>
- References: <1077904103.25851.15.camel@arrakis.localnet> <20040227232156.GA29196@pigdog.org> <m3n071dctn.fsf@dionysos.nibelungen.rez> <87y8ql64oc.fsf@unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us>
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:56:03PM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> >>>>> "MR" == Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org> writes:
>
> MR> In my opinion, "serious objection" to Josselin Mouette
> MR> proposal have no ground if we are talking about procedure.
>
> Sorry, but I'm unaware of any other discussions joss@ has had with
> Ryan. I don't think a post on d-d really counts as making contact with
> the current maintainer.
The people who are interested in the gdm package are aware of many
discussions - see the debian-gtk-gnome mailing list archives
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://www.tildemh.com
`- mh@debian.org | mh@tildemh.com | mh344@cam.ac.uk
Reply to: