Re: re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Afaict the only thing that is open for discussion is whether you
> followed the protocol in developer's reference correctly.
> And ticking of the checklist there is just one missing piece of
> information - the timeline. How much time did pass between the
> "intend to NMU"-mail and the actual upload? (Did you use a DELAYED
> queue?) - My gut feeling says that 2-3 days between mailing the
> maintainer and uploading the package to ftp-master would have been
> appropriate (7 days - (release-cycle bonus + rc-bug bonus)).
> cu andreas
He didn't mail the maintainer. And base packages should require more lead