Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't beingaccepted.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:35:31AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Obviously it was in weak-no-auto-build. That's fairly ok when there is no
> > huge backlog. So the question is more, why the buildd admin realised that
> > problem and didn't act on it?
> Our DPL realised the problem (Took 6 mails, 3 each, and didn't take a
> day I think. Thats communication.), not the buildd admin. I haven't seen
> any indication yet that the configuration was changed, the next
> qt-x11-free upload will tell.
--- Day changed Sat Feb 07 2004
02:14 < mrvn> I want to know why qt-x11-free just doesn't get picked up by
the mipsel buildd. I suspect its in not-for-us.
02:14 < ij> http://www.buildd.net/buildd/mipsel_Not-For-Us.html
02:15 < mrvn> ij: The buildds own one.
02:15 < ij> mrvn: no-auto-build or weak-no-auto
02:15 < mrvn> ij: one of those
Guessing that it was in weak-no-auto-build was easy. That it need 6 mails
is, well, .... I think I better to go to bed now and don't think about it