[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ntp 4.2.0 in experimental

On Feb 15, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:

 >Hmm.  I don't think I fall into either category.  I have large numbers
 >of Debian servers which all use Kerberos, which means they all run ntp.
 >We run a single ntp server locally, that all the other machines point
 >at; since being in sync with the KDC is more important here than being
 >precisely in sync with the outside world, this provides a comparatively
 >reliable method of achieving this goal.  It reduces the load we impose
 >on busy public NTP servers, and there's been minimal need for config
 >customization (firewalls can take care of most such issues).
 >Which group would you classify our site in?
One which needs a site-wide method of pushing config files to hosts.

ciao, |
Marco | [4602 paJMXz5dOLXZ.]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: