On Feb 15, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: >Hmm. I don't think I fall into either category. I have large numbers >of Debian servers which all use Kerberos, which means they all run ntp. >We run a single ntp server locally, that all the other machines point >at; since being in sync with the KDC is more important here than being >precisely in sync with the outside world, this provides a comparatively >reliable method of achieving this goal. It reduces the load we impose >on busy public NTP servers, and there's been minimal need for config >customization (firewalls can take care of most such issues). > >Which group would you classify our site in? One which needs a site-wide method of pushing config files to hosts. -- ciao, | Marco | [4602 paJMXz5dOLXZ.]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature