Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:26:58 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040215092658.GC8562@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040215015257.GU18199@einval.com>
References: <[🔎] 20040215015257.GU18199@einval.com>

* Steve McIntyre (steve@einval.com) [040215 02:55]:
> I'm considering posting bugs against packages in the list asking for
> more sensible package splits. Comments?

Do it, and ignore unwilling maintainers.

Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Future of linux-wlan-ng?
Next by Date: Re: ntp 4.2.0 in experimental
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Next by thread: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread