Not really willing to jump in on this discussion, but... On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:09:39PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: [...] > Therefore there was the idea t let his machines run as buildds as > well. That was rejected because "he is no DD" and it was said, that it > would be acceptable when a DD was taking the buildd part and sign the > packages. So it happened. Wouter Verhelst mailed the needed info to > James and Ryan (I think), but for more than two weeks nothing happened > and no info available on that as well. That's not fully accurate. It did indeed take two weeks, but James mailed me a few days ago that I had encrypted the SSH RSA key using a GPG key of which he didn't have the private key anymore. He's mailed me this probably at the same time he's added akire's key to the right file; I suspect this'll be added when that mail gets on top of his TODO list again. [...] > a) If you work fine with Goswin and cooperates with him nicely, you'll > run against walls when you ned to interact wih James or Ryan. I do > know that some people have strong objections against Goswin for years > now. But I think as well that personal dislikes shouldn't interfere > with some role position work as it is the position of being a DAM or > giving w-b access to others, that might result in negative > side-effects for a whole arch. This, I think, is also not accurate. I don't buy it if people say that James didn't add this key because he didn't "like" Goswin or anyone else. (Most of) the rest of your mail, I do agree with; it appears that James and Ryan are overloaded with work, and that they could use some help. -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation." "So is my neck, stop it anyway!" -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.
Description: Digital signature