Re: c102 transition nearly complete... mini-mass bug filing OK?
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 01:29:48PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:57:38PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Some of these have been uploaded recently, and only have this outdated
> > dependency on one architecture (such as jigdo), implying that their
> > maintainer is building binary uploads on a woody system or something like
> > that. The maintainers will need to be contacted in order to make sure
> > that this is permanently fixed.
> Actually, jigdo *needs* to be compiled with g++-2.95 ATM because of the
> broken large file support in g++-3.x (bug #220000). I'll add an explicit
> build-dep for the next upload.
Interesting...I had never tried LFS with C++ iostreams until gcc 3.2, and so
I assumed it had never worked. I didn't realize this was a regression.