[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: c102 transition nearly complete... mini-mass bug filing OK?



On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:10:49PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:

> http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/
> is back up, and shows that there are only 46 source packages still compiled
> with g++ 2.95 (not counting intentional exceptions like qt2), and *all*
> libraries have transitioned.  Excellent!

Some of those remaining are in non-free:

flashplugin-nonfree
eagle
maelstrom

flashplugin-nonfree we certainly can't do anything about, and I'm not sure
about the other two.

The remaining list is:

abuse-sdl
achilles
annoyance-filter
ava
bbmail
bbpal
billard-gl
blackbook
cdindex-client
cqcam
craft
flying
gnusim8085
gpppkill
gpsk31
jags
jigdo
jigdo-file
juice
login.app
logout-button
mona
mpatrol
npadmin
oonsoo
orp
picp
pinball
playmp3list
pose
qps
re2c
sound-recorder
steghide
syscalltrack
tempest
tkisem
twutils
vat
vbs
vipec
x10
xmovie
yadex


Some of these have been uploaded recently, and only have this outdated
dependency on one architecture (such as jigdo), implying that their
maintainer is building binary uploads on a woody system or something like
that.  The maintainers will need to be contacted in order to make sure that
this is permanently fixed.

> Does it seem reasonable to file a bug against every one of these packages
> (except those which already have such bugs filed against them)?
> If so, what severity should I use?

Let's discuss it here first.

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: