[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How much spam in the lists is "too much"?

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 13:51, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Is it
> really fair to favor non-subscribers, who do not even have to register
> in the whitelist to be able to post, over subscribers, who have to
> receive all the crap in their mailboxes?

Like this e-mail.

I believe this has been hashed to death many times before. Once again it
probably will be again. Wasting Thousands of MB in distributing it (the
dead discussion that always ends up in keeping it a non-member postings
allowed mail-list.)

Thanks, but I already put up with uselss *SPAM* for \/1@GR@ (Viagra) and
making my schlong bigger and beefier. As well as All the stuff you
complain about.

If you aren't prepared to filter mail, which I've been doing since
before USENET got those "cross-posters".

You won't solve this and neither "will" anyone else.
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net
REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: