Re: FHS compliance?
* Joel Konkle-Parker <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004-01-28 23:44]:
> According to Martin's post to debian-lsb
> FHS 2.3 has just been released. I noticed in the Policy Manual (9.1.1)
> that we only are required to comply with FHS 2.1.
> Why the lag? With the new release, should we at least look towards 2.2
> compliance? Or is there some kind of show-stopper that's preventing this?
I don't think there's a good reason (at least for 2.2) - it just
hasn't been done yet. :(
#212434 - [PROPOSED] recommend FHS 2.2 rather than 2.1
#230217 - [PROPOSAL] Should update to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard FHS 2.3