Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Maybe we could make a list of packages that should be autobuild in
> > contrib/non-free and distribute that to the buildds.
> This reasonable approach was discussed / suggested several times
> (just search the archive) and ended always in: It's free. Would you
> volunteer to do it? I would love if someone would grab this hut.
> > Or rather make a list of packages not to be build and allow
> > contrib/non-free in general, since the buildds have that mechanism
> > already.
> This would also work but this is kind of politics which concerns non-free.
> So if we try to go with the positive list approach above some people might
> be more happy ...
Add everything in non-free/contrib to the list and remove on request.
But I guess people would then complain how long it takes to check the
list. A list in wanna-build or quinn-diff would be better. Do it once
for all archs on a fast machine (auric).
> Kind regards