Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: >>... >> > >> > unstable >> > / \ >> > / \ >> >desktop-testing testing >> > | | >> > | | >> >desktop-stable stable >> >> >> I would do it differently. What about the following: >> >> >> unstable base unstable add-ons >> | | >> | | >> testing base | >> | | >> | | >> stable base stable add-ons >>... >> The server systems that require consistency in their environments would >> simply use the base system, which would consist of the basic 'server' >> packages. > > What's a "basic 'server' package" that wouldn't be updated for a long > time in your scheme? > > Perl? > PHP? > SpamAssassin? What about the security updates?! ;) -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `-
Attachment:
pgpaF3vxzGAqn.pgp
Description: PGP signature