[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: A More Radical Multi-Arch Counter-Proposal

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:55:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Forget it. A chroot is out of the question. Noone is going for it.
> > > 
> > > Multiarch is coming and its going to have /lib, /lib32 and/or /lib64
> > > dpenending on the architecture involved.
> > 
> > Is that not short-sighted?  I already posted examples where multiple
> > 32-bit architectures could be in use, for example.  If we are going to
> > the effort of making this support possible, why do we not do so in a
> > more inclusive way, at little additional expense?
> You can think of something more or better but changing what has been
> set for years will be realy hard. You have to get every other linux
> distribution (or at least a majority) to agree on any change [...]


Reply to: