Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
* Michael Poole [Sun, Jan 11 2004, 04:19:48PM]:
> > So what, in your opinion, are the technologies (or significant packages)
> > which should be in Debian but are not? And why do you think they are
> > not?
> Mono. I believe Mono packages are missing mostly for want of
> attention: there are some packaging issues to work through, and no
> Common Language Infrastructure/.NET policy yet.
We are working on it. pkg-mono registration on Alioth is requested, you
are welcome to subsribe to the mailing lists. Or join #debian-mono on
Fallen ist keine Schande, aber Liegenbleiben.
-- Demokrit (eigtl. Demokritos von Abdera, 460-370 v. Chr.)