Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:04:29 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1073930668.9871.3.camel@orion>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>

Il dom, 2004-01-11 alle 20:53, Dan Shearer ha scritto:
> So what, in your opinion, are the technologies (or significant packages)
> which should be in Debian but are not? 

A more uniform menu system

As said by others, good java support

-- 
Emanuele Rocca - 1024D/EAF19B60

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Joel Konkle-Parker <jjk3@msstate.edu>

References:
- Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>

Prev by Date: Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Next by Date: Re: fixing debconf stdin bug
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread