Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: Joel Konkle-Parker <jjk3@msstate.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:06:06 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 1073952366.4003366ee92b8@webmail.msstate.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1073930668.9871.3.camel@orion>
References: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org> <[🔎] 1073930668.9871.3.camel@orion>

Il dom, 2004-01-11 alle 20:53, Dan Shearer ha scritto:
> > So what, in your opinion, are the technologies (or significant
> packages)
> > which should be in Debian but are not? 

A home-user install path that allows for easy setup of the most common desktop
features (and fast user switching).


-- 
Joel Konkle-Parker
Webmaster [Ballsome.com]

Phone     [662-518-1636]
E-mail    [jjk3@msstate.edu]

Reply to:

References:
- Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: master is very low of disk space
Next by Date: Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread