[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: util-linux seems to have /sbin/fsck

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 04:03:18PM +0900, Donggyoo Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:44:10AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 
> > No, it's not a bug.
> > 
> > Since e2fsprogs is essential, no user should ever remove it (and a 
> > system without it is by definition broken).
> > 
> > Making an essential package non-essential without breaking _any_ system 
> > is somewhere between "hard" and "impossible".
> > 
> >
> How about this?
> e2fsprogs's ``Essential: yes`` does not change for some ext2,ext3 user. and add ``Recommends: e2fsprogs`` at e2fsprogs.(for begginer)
> and then /sbin/mkfs move from e2fsprogs to util-linux.
> and initscripts has ``Depends: ... e2fsprogs|xfsprogs|jfsutils|reiserfsprogs``.
> How about this? I want to see your advice about this.

As long as e2fsprogs is essential, every Debian system without e2fsprogs 
is by definition completely broken.

> I am subscribed on this list. Don't CC to me.

If that's import for you, why don't you add a Reply-To or 
Mail-Followup-To header to your mails?

BTW: Why did you disregard my Mail-Followup-To header?

> Thank you,
> Donggyoo.



       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Reply to: