Re: apt 0.6 in experimental
- To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, Michael Ablassmeier <abi@grinser.de>
- Subject: Re: apt 0.6 in experimental
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:41:34 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] A6DE3686-3CAB-11D8-BEF5-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
- In-reply-to: <20031231203522.GD1365@alcor.net>
- References: <20031226234444.GN17472@alcor.net> <200312300226.29796.danchev@spnet.net> <20031230002726.GS1365@alcor.net> <200312300954.58539.danchev@spnet.net> <20031230165317.GZ1365@alcor.net> <20031230184954.GA947@mail.schiach.de> <20031230185649.GE1365@alcor.net> <9B252B14-3BCA-11D8-A634-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <20031231203522.GD1365@alcor.net>
On Dec 31, 2003, at 15:35, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:50:37PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Dec 30, 2003, at 13:56, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
/lib/tls? Are you using a 2.6 kernel? Try using whatever magic
environment
variable turns that stuff off and uses the normal libraries.
apt-cache search segfaults for me too, and I'm on 2.4.22.
Try 0.6.7+.
Thanks, 0.6.8 works. And it worked for a while today.
However, now I get new errors:
Fetched 287kB in 0s (347kB/s)
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/non-free/binary-i386/
Packages.gz MD5Sum mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/non-free/source/
Sources.gz MD5Sum mismatch
Reading Package Lists... Error!
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://http.us.debian.org
testing/non-free Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_non-
free_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
E: Unable to parse package file
/var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_Release (1)
E: Problem opening
/var/lib/apt/lists/
http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_contrib_binary-i386_Packages
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
And when I take out non-free, I still get the dists_testing_Release (1)
error...
And it was working so well for a few hours :-(
Reply to: