Re: apt 0.6 in experimental
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: apt 0.6 in experimental
- From: Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 14:18:30 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040101221830.GD1405@alcor.net>
- Mail-followup-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <20031231170918.GA22856@azure.humbug.org.au>
- References: <20031226234444.GN17472@alcor.net> <20031227164756.GC7060@kitenet.net> <20031227204642.GW17472@alcor.net> <20031228172627.GA18792@kitenet.net> <20031228183247.GA20300@kitenet.net> <20031228211822.GT17472@alcor.net> <20031228222818.GX17472@alcor.net> <20031229001133.GF17472@alcor.net> <20031229033217.GA11995@kitenet.net> <20031231170918.GA22856@azure.humbug.org.au>
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 03:09:18AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:32:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> ] Origin: Nathaniel W. Turner
> ] Label: Unofficial Snapshot Packages
> I'd expect the spaces there to cause problems. If they don't, I'm out of
> ideas too.
I don't think that apt cares as far as parsing the file, but I'm not sure
that the syntax of apt_preferences would allow these values to be used in
> Some rough documentation, AIUI:
> ] Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:57:17 UTC
> The timestamp of the Release file, in "date -uR" format.
When I added Release file support to apt-ftparchive, I used
strftime(...,"%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S UTC") which matches what I see in the
Release files in the archive:
mizar:[~] curl -s 'http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/Release' |grep Date
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 20:41:22 UTC
which is different from RFC-822 format (date -R).
> ] Architectures: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> ] Components: main contrib non-free
> Architectures and Components this distribution includes. Multiple words, one
> for each arch/component, separated by spaces.
> ] Description: Debian 3.0r2 Released 20th November 2003
> Human readable description. In theory this was meant to also allow for
> multiline descriptions (in the normal control-file way) that could tell
> you what the difference between unstable and stable is, for example. That
> hasn't happened so far though.
APT presently does not pay attention to these fields, fwiw. It would be
nice if it displayed Description in some places I think, even more so for