Re: Bug#224742 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#224742 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...)
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 16:47:51 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040101214751.GO1765@deadbeast.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87pte5tejb.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
- References: <E1AY2P1-0000RR-00@marvin.casa> <handler.224742.D224742.10723601891395.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> <20031225144158.GA10770@cs.unibo.it> <pan.2003.12.25.17.39.16.826597@smurf.noris.de> <87ptecwqyt.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031226064102.GA24571@azure.humbug.org.au> <87oetwkmfm.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <87k74j8z26.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no> <20031231090848.GQ11133@deadbeast.net> <87pte5tejb.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Branden Robinson
> | So, the "wontfix" tag is inapplicable to wishlist bugs by definition?
>
> No, but the maintainer can choose to close the bug instead.
And he cannot make this choice with non-wishlist bugs? Is it
inappropriate to close a non-wishlist bug instead of tagging it wontfix?
How do you justify your answers to these questions using the existing
BTS documentation?
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | // // // / /
branden@debian.org | EI 'AANIIGOO 'AHOOT'E
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: