RE: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy
Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:32:14 +1000 Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> wrote:
> > yes, definitely for general use. it's just as effective for general
> > use as it is for my personal use - in fact, if more people did the kind
> > of stuff that i do then there wouldn't be a spam problem, because the
> > spammers would just give up and go home.
>
> Wow, makes you wonder how the Taiwanese would send email to
> each other!
I don't remember anybody here advocating the use of taiwan.blackholes.us.
> > doing stuff like this is what it takes to have a (mostly) spam-free
> > mailbox. nothing else works.
>
> SA works. Your mistake is that you presume that if it touches SA it
> equals being accepted.
No, I think he presumes that the widespread use of SA only shifts the problem from "obtrusive-looking spam" to "non-obtrusive-looking spam". I presume the same.
Reply to: