Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 03:26:36PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > I also notice that apt downloads the whole Release file each time with > > apparently no caching. 34kb does take a few seconds extra on dialup. > > Either this was better before, or the switch to the larger main release > > file had made the time more apparent. > > #203741 I know, but that doesn't explain why apt can't use the same http timestamp techniques it uses for other files to avoid re-downloading the Release file each time. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature