Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...
Scripsit Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > 3) I repeatedly asked for technical reasons why you didn't want to
> > change ifupdown accordingly, and I was ready to discuss them, and
> > maybe accept them, but you never provided any
> That's a complaint, not a technical reason for something to happen.
You miss the point. The point that's being contested is not which
techincal thins should happen right here, but whether Enrico has a
right to *wish* for them to happen.
> more importantly the file belongs to ifupdown, and if other programs
> wish to use it, they get to follow ifupdown's rules.
Nobody is disagreeing with that. Everyone agrees that the ifupdown
package decides what can be used. Nobody wants to change that. But
even so, one can still have opinons about *what* it should decide.
That is a different thing from not recognizing that you are the one
Henning Makholm "They discussed old Tommy Somebody and Jerry Someone Else."