Re: dpkg-sig: sign binary debian archive files
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'm definitely worried about the name here. dpkg-iasearch ran into
> problems a while ago because it intruded on the dpkg namespace. I don't
> think that non-dpkg code should be called dpkg-foo.
OTOH, some of us think dpkg-sigs should be made part of dpkg proper ASAP...
(and please, no waiting for a mythical dpkg 2.0 for that...)
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot