Re: [developers-l] Re: [debian-devel] Re: security enhanced debian branch?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote:
> Why is LSM good enough for SELinux and not for RSBAC? Because SELinux was
> changed to fit LSM. One example, network access control was removed from
> SELinux because there are no network access control hooks provided by LSM.
I thought (reading SELinux news) at [1] that the network acl are there:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reimplemented network interface and node controls (2.6 only).
Can anyone explain what that means?
[1] http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/news.html
Reply to: