Re: experimental codename
Graham Wilson <email@example.com> wrote:
> I think maybe many problems with using experimental as a playground for
> development packages could be remedied by creating a central document
> about it. Things to include might be:
> * sources.lists lines
> * using APT's preferences to pin packages from experimental
> * how to build packages in experimental for arches that are missing
> (since there are not buildds)
> * anything else?
I think the respective section in Developer's Reference might be a
good place for this and it already features the sources.list entry.
Hey, da ist ein Ballonautomat auf der Toilette!
Unofficial _Debian-packages_ of latest unstable _tin_