Re: Building a distribution from source?
Hello!
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 04:37, Jakob Lell <jlell@JakobLell.de> wrote:
> > maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian woody
> Adamantix in now what we want to do, what we want to do is to improve Debian.
``We''? Who is ``we''? It is unlikely that you are one of them royal people, so
I take it you meant to say:
Adamantix is not what I want to do, what I want to do is to improve Debian.
Fair enough. But if I were to improve Debian, I would put PaX in the default
kernel source.
> > create installation CDs yourselve. For more information about Adamantix,
> > see http://trusteddebian.org/
> That URL is obsolete.
Right, it is obsolete. Please use http://www.adamantix.org/ instead. Not that
it makes any difference, because you end up with the same web page in front
of you.
> They can not use the "trusted Debian" name any more.
``They''? Who is ``they''? Does ``they'' include Debian developers who actively
contribute to Adamantix or not? You don't make any sense here Russell, let me
rephrase it again:
Peter can not use the "trusted Debian" name any more.
Oh yes I can. Martin Michlmayr and I have an agreement that I (you may read
``we'' here if you want) can use the trusteddebian.org domain for the web site
and for e-mail (although not for advertising it). That is why you see a big
Adamantix logo when you select www.trusteddebian.org.
IMHO it was a big win for the project to be renamed from Trusted Debian to
Adamantix.
> In fact the domain should probably be de-registered to avoid confusion.
If anyone appears to be confused here, it seems to be you (again).
Groetjes,
Peter Busser
Reply to: