On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:33:39AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "aj" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> aj> or overloaded with work, or, for that matter, fixing compromised Debian
> aj> servers -- do you think it's desirable and possible to:
>
> aj> * for confirmed bugs with a known fix, upload a fixed package
> aj> within a day or two of the patch been sent to the bug log
> No, I don't think it is always desirable to do this and certainly my
> maintinance style doesn't work well with this methodology. The
> problem is there is a fairly high fixed cost to building, testing and
> doing release management for a package.
Those are really arguments that it's not always /possible/ -- if you
weren't having to make those trade offs, I'm sure you'd love to upload
fixes within a couple of days if you *could*:
> But I think dealing with normal bugs with confirmed fixes in a month
> or two is much more reasonable than a day or two. I'd feel
> differently if Debian was my primary job or if I found a style of
> maintaining packages that worked well for me with this goal.
So I don't feel any urge to disagree with anything you've said there.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
pgpmtlc2UpSl8.pgp
Description: PGP signature