Re: [RFC] adding system users: which is the best way??
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:15, Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 04:42:44AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > Presumable, if you purge the package, then the user is no longer
> > > needed. So shouldn't the user be deleted?
> > We cannot guarantee that no file on disk is owned by the user or group.
> > The local admin may for instance have made a backup copy of files owned
> > by the user (cp -a /etc/foo/ /etc/foo.bak; suppose something in that
> > dir is uid or gid user).
> Erm, surely everything in /etc should be owned by root? The group mightn't
> be, but surely the user should be? (Otherwise you're allowing random
> daemons to _modify_ your configuration, rather than just read it)
Some daemons such as cups are written in a way that requires that they be able
to write to their own configuration files. If such a daemon is run as
non-root then the files will have to be owned by non-root if the "create new
file and rename" method of file update is used.
Of course having CUPS operate in a different manner would be a really good
idea, but I don't see it getting changed in the near future.
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page